LUDWIG LAWYERS
  • Welcome
  • ABOUT
    • BEATRICE LUDWIG
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Commercial Law
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Civil Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Charities & Not for Profits Law
    • Wills and Estates
  • Regenerative Agriculture
  • BLOG
  • STORIES
  • Contact

Ludwig Lawyers Blog

At Ludwig Lawyers, we follow the latest legislative developments and court cases,
​with specific focus on regenerative agriculture and health.  
CONTACT LUDWIG LAWYERS

US Supreme Court decision: Human genes cannot be patented

12/26/2013

0 Comments

 
Human genes that have been isolated from the human DNA cannot be patented in the United States. This landmark decision was made on 13 June 2013 by the highest court of the United States, the United States Supreme Court, in Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics 569 US 12-398 (2013). 

The bad news is that, unfortunately, this decision does not extend to ‘synthetic’ genetic material that can still be patented even though ‘synthetic’ genetic material, when examined closely, is not artificial at all. It is still something that exists in nature and should therefore not be patentable. 

The good news is that at least the so-called ‘non synthetic’ genetic material may no longer be patented in the United States. This decision will have a profound effect on existing US patents that have been granted to biotechnology and medical companies over the last few decades. These patents will now be void in the United States - a win for public interest groups and humanity at large, and a loss for biotech.

What's the situation in Australia? A fundamental rule of patent law in Australia is that patents can only be granted over inventions, not mere discoveries of something that already exists in nature.

As discussed in the writer’s previous article “March Against Monsanto 2013 - Patenting of Genes and GMOs” of 25 May 2013, the relevant court in Australia, the Federal Court of Australia, was first asked to decide in 2012 whether isolated human genes can be patented - in the Federal Court of Australia case Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics Inc [2013] FCA 65. In that case, Myriad Genetics had obtained a patent on a breast cancer gene, the BRCA1 gene. 

In the writer’s view, the BRCA1 gene is not an invention. It is something that exists in nature. It was discovered, not invented. Therefore, it should not be patentable. 

Judge Nicholas, the Federal Court of Australia judge who handed down the Myriad Genetics decision on 15 February 2013, acknowledged that a gene that is in the human body, cannot be patented. However, Judge Nicholas then turned around and held that once the gene is isolated, that is, removed from the human body, it can be patented. 

The second applicant, Yvonne D’Arcy, a cancer survivor, then appealed the Myriad Genetics decision to the Full Federal Court, where the appeal was heard in August 2013. The Full Federal Court decision is pending, and both, biotech and public interest groups are waiting in suspense whether the Full Federal Court will follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court - Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics 569 US 12-398 (2013).
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Beatrice Ludwig is the Principal Solicitor at Ludwig Lawyers.

    Archives

    July 2021
    September 2019
    October 2018
    May 2017
    July 2016
    August 2014
    May 2014
    December 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    May 2012
    February 2012
    September 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011

    Categories

    All
    Corporate & Commercial
    Environment Protection
    GMO Genetic Engineering
    Intellectual Property
    Patenting Of Genes
    Renewable Energy
    Sustainable Agriculture

    RSS Feed

+61410 583 550 - info@ludwiglawyers.com
LUDWIG LAWYERS - Simple Solutions in a Complex Environment
MAIL: Suite 3377, 248 Beach Road, Batehaven NSW 2536, Australia
MEETINGS VIA ZOOM OR IN PERSON - BY APPOINTMENT ONLY
ABN 29487308877
  • Welcome
  • ABOUT
    • BEATRICE LUDWIG
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Commercial Law
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Civil Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Charities & Not for Profits Law
    • Wills and Estates
  • Regenerative Agriculture
  • BLOG
  • STORIES
  • Contact